Bug 12041 – Strange warning pragma when instantiating WhiteHole

Status
RESOLVED
Resolution
FIXED
Severity
normal
Priority
P2
Component
phobos
Product
D
Version
D2
Platform
All
OS
All
Creation time
2014-01-30T02:01:00Z
Last change time
2014-01-30T03:40:03Z
Keywords
diagnostic, pull
Assigned to
nobody
Creator
andrej.mitrovich

Comments

Comment #0 by andrej.mitrovich — 2014-01-30T02:01:44Z
Phobos has been emitting this diagnostic lately, the reduced case is: ----- import std.typecons; interface I { void bar() nothrow; } void main() { new WhiteHole!I; } ----- $ dmd test.d > Warning: WhiteHole!(I) used assert(0) instead of Error for the auto-implemented nothrow function I.bar There is no file+line info, and I don't understand the diagnostic at all?
Comment #1 by andrej.mitrovich — 2014-01-30T02:03:09Z
Oh nevermind, it's actually an internal pragma emitted from: /// ditto template generateAssertTrap(C, func.../+[BUG 4217]+/) { static if (functionAttributes!(func) & FunctionAttribute.nothrow_) //XXX { pragma(msg, "Warning: WhiteHole!(", C, ") used assert(0) instead ", "of Error for the auto-implemented nothrow function ", C, ".", __traits(identifier, func)); enum string generateAssertTrap = `assert(0, "` ~ C.stringof ~ "." ~ __traits(identifier, func) ~ ` is not implemented");`; } else enum string generateAssertTrap = `throw new NotImplementedError("` ~ C.stringof ~ "." ~ __traits(identifier, func) ~ `");`; } However I still don't understand the diagnostic. I'll change this to be a library issue.
Comment #2 by k.hara.pg — 2014-01-30T02:44:21Z
(In reply to comment #1) > However I still don't understand the diagnostic. I'll change this to be a > library issue. In old days, throwing Error from nothrow function had caused "function foo is nothrow yet may throw" error. As a workaround, WhiteHole used assert(0) instead throwing NotImplementedError for abstract nothrow functions. It's also noted in BUGS section of WhiteHole. BUGS: Nothrow functions cause program to abort in release mode because the trap is implemented with $(D assert(0)) for nothrow functions. But today, the compiler/lamguage limitation is already removed. So we can just remove the workaround code from WhileHole implementation. Phobos fix: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1892
Comment #3 by github-bugzilla — 2014-01-30T03:22:34Z
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/557799fc556f0d5fd3269feb689d258d6bb8debb fix Issue 12041 - Strange warning pragma when instantiating WhiteHole Remove restiction in AutoImplement with nothrow function. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/49f6c6ac4b343b28f2e34bcc13e72544334b1802 Merge pull request #1892 from 9rnsr/fix12041 Issue 12041 - Strange warning pragma when instantiating WhiteHole