Bug 12452 – To mitigate unwanted integer division precision loss

Status
ASSIGNED
Severity
enhancement
Priority
P4
Component
dmd
Product
D
Version
D2
Platform
All
OS
All
Creation time
2014-03-24T07:14:56Z
Last change time
2024-12-13T18:18:44Z
Assigned to
Don
Creator
bearophile_hugs
Moved to GitHub: dmd#18801 →

Comments

Comment #0 by bearophile_hugs — 2014-03-24T07:14:56Z
This kind of code sometimes is wrong, because you forget to cast x to double before the division and you lose precision (note that here the compiler knows that the result of the division will go in a floating point variable): void main() { int x = 15; double y = x / 10; } (The cause is that unfortunately in D the integer division uses the same operator as the FP division. In Python there is the / and // operators. In OcaML there are the / and /., in Delphi there are the / and div operators, in Ada the two operands need to be of the same type). Seasoned C/C++/D programmers watch for the types every time they perform a division, to avoid that trap, and they often use explicit casts in that kind of code (this uses a recently introduce syntax that avoids the use of a cast()): double y = double(x) / 10; But less experienced programmers introduce bugs with divisions. Can D help the programmers reduce the frequency of similar bugs? - - - - - - - - - - - - A comment by Daniel Murphy: > Newbies have to realize that integers aren't real numbers eventually. I have seen that even programmers with some experience once in a while create this bug. Because you have to keep attention to the types of each division usage, and once in a while your attention slips (or perhaps some bugs of this kind are created by successive type changes). An example of this possible code found in real code: Search for "GetTransmission()" in this page: http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0242/ The possible bug: int SpectralLMM5Interface::GetTransmission(...., double& transmission) { .... int16_t tr = 0; memcpy(&tr, answer + 1, 2); tr = ntohs(tr); transmission = tr/10; .... } - - - - - - - - - - - - Don suggests: > It is indeed a common floating-point bug. > > I came up with a solution for this a couple of years ago, never > got around to doing a pull request, but it's on the newsgroup > somewhere. It's a little extension to the range propagation > implementation. You add a boolean flag to the range, which > indicates 'a fractional part has been discarded'. This flag gets > set whenever you perform an integer division (or integer > exponentiation with a negative power), and is cleared whenever > there is a cast or a bitwise operation. > > Then, disallow implicit casting from integer to floating point > whenever the fractional bit is set. Catches all these kinds of > bugs, doesn't require any changes to the language. - - - - - - - - - - - -
Comment #1 by nick — 2021-05-26T10:02:20Z
> I came up with a solution for this a couple of years ago, never > got around to doing a pull request, but it's on the newsgroup > somewhere. https://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
Comment #2 by robert.schadek — 2024-12-13T18:18:44Z
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/18801 DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB