Bug 15295 – Another wrong code bug with -inline and foreach/map/all

Status
RESOLVED
Resolution
FIXED
Severity
major
Priority
P1
Component
dmd
Product
D
Version
D2
Platform
x86
OS
Windows
Creation time
2015-11-06T06:08:00Z
Last change time
2016-12-23T01:11:20Z
Keywords
wrong-code
Assigned to
nobody
Creator
k.hara.pg

Attachments

IDFilenameSummaryContent-TypeSize
1563bug15295.zipReduced test caseapplication/x-zip-compressed1051

Comments

Comment #0 by k.hara.pg — 2015-11-06T06:08:01Z
Separated from: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13244#c9 ================================ I'm getting this again with dmd 2.069. With the files below, running rdmd -g -inline main.d I get: object.Error@(0): Access Violation ---------------- 0x00821014 0x0040221A in D3std5array135__T5arrayTS3std9algorithm9iteration87__T9MapResultS67_D11failsinline11FailsInline7146BC2938FC1915EBA515935C5C811A 0x0040247F in void failsinline.FailsInline.failsinline() at E:\source\dice\failsinline.d(9) 0x00402027 in _Dmain at E:\source\dice\main.d(7) 0x00402BF7 in D2rt6dmain211_d_run_mainUiPPaPUAAaZiZ6runAllMFZ9__lambda1MFZv 0x00402BBB in void rt.dmain2._d_run_main(int, char**, extern (C) int function(char[][])*).runAll() 0x00402ABC in _d_run_main 0x004023F0 in main at E:\source\dice\main.d(7) 0x0041D0F5 in mainCRTStartup 0x77693744 in BaseThreadInitThunk 0x77BBA064 in RtlSetCurrentTransaction 0x77BBA02F in RtlSetCurrentTransaction When removing the std.algorithm import from main.d or compiling without -inline it works fine. -- main.d -- import std.algorithm; import failsinline; void main() { auto fail = new FailsInline(); fail.failsinline(); } -- main.d -- -- failsinline.d -- import std.algorithm : map; import std.array : array; class FailsInline { void failsinline() { auto transform = (int i) => i; [0].map!transform.array; } } -- failsinline.d --
Comment #1 by k.hara.pg — 2015-11-06T06:20:53Z
Created attachment 1563 Reduced test case
Comment #2 by greeenify — 2016-12-23T01:11:20Z
This has probably been resolved in the meanwhile :) Compiling the examples throw no error with v2.072.1 (and prints [0] if an writeln) is added. Thus closing, please reopen if is still valid for you.