Comment #0 by timothee.cour2 — 2018-02-05T19:31:32Z
`dmd -cov -run main.d` shows 100% coverage; this is misleading since a branch is not taken:
```
void main(){
int a;
if(false) a+=10;
}
```
how about adding a `-covmode=[loc|branch]` that would allow either reporting LOC coverage or branch coverage?
branch coverage would report number of branches taken at least once / total number of branches.
It would not only address the above issue, but it is IMO a much better metric for coverage, less sensitive to 'overcounting' of large blocks in main code branches (size of code block in a branch is irrelevant as far as testing is concerned); eg:
```
int fun(int x){
if(x<0)
return fun2(); // accounts for 1 LOC and 1 branch
// long block of non-branching code here... // accounts for 10 LOC and 1 branch
}
```
NOTE: branches would include anything that allows more than 1 code path (eg: switch, if)
Comment #1 by robert.schadek — 2024-12-13T18:56:45Z