Bug 19657 – D compiler fails to resolve circular module dependency when modules are compiled together

Status
RESOLVED
Resolution
FIXED
Severity
regression
Priority
P1
Component
dmd
Product
D
Version
D2
Platform
x86_64
OS
Linux
Creation time
2019-02-06T13:49:03Z
Last change time
2020-03-13T18:15:35Z
Keywords
pull
Assigned to
No Owner
Creator
Puneet Goel

Attachments

IDFilenameSummaryContent-TypeSize
1731deploopbug.tgzTar Gzipped codeapplication/x-compressed-tar8886

Comments

Comment #0 by puneet — 2019-02-06T13:49:03Z
Created attachment 1731 Tar Gzipped code Test case attached as tar gzipped file. Related to bug 19656. But here the bug appears when the modules are compiled together in a particular order. No error when compiling the modules separately. $ for i in *.d; do dmd -c $i; done # compiles without issue $ dmd -c seq.d foo.d frop.d pol.d trump.d bar.d baz.d # no issue $ dmd -c foo.d frop.d pol.d trump.d bar.d baz.d seq.d frop.d(5): Error: function bool frop.frop.func(foo rhs, bar bee) does not override any function, did you mean to override bool foo.foo.func(foo rhs, bar bee)?
Comment #1 by puneet — 2019-02-06T14:05:09Z
Comment #2 by puneet — 2019-02-12T10:36:31Z
Works with version 2.074.1 of DMD. Fails with 2.075.0 and later. Marking as regression.
Comment #3 by dlang-bot — 2019-03-20T12:57:59Z
@puneet created dlang/dmd pull request #9471 "Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750" fixing this issue: - Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750 The Semantic (pass 1) analysis for classes is handled by visit(ClassDeclaration ) method of DsymbolSemanticVisitor class. For a given class, this method may be run multiple times in order to resolve forward references. The method incrementally tries to resolve the types referred to by the members of the class. The subsequent calls to this method are short-circuited if the class members have been fully analyzed. For this the code tests that it is not the first/main call to the method (semanticRun == PASS.init else branch), scx is not set, and that the cldec.symtab is already set. If all these conditions are met, the method returns. But before returning, the method was setting cldec.semanticRun to PASS.semanticdone. It should not set semanticRun since the class has not been fully analyzed yet. The base class analysis for this class could be pending and as a result vtable may not have been fully created. This fake setting of semanticRun results in the semantic analyzer to believe that the class has been fully analyzed. As exposed by the issues 19656, 19657, 19746 and 19750, it may result in compile time errors when a derived type class is getting analyzed and because of this fake semanticdone on the base class, the semantic analysis construes that an overridden method is not defined in the base class. Issue 19655 exposes a scenario where a buggy vtable may be created and a call to class method may result in execution of some adhoc code. https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9471
Comment #4 by dlang-bot — 2019-03-21T12:11:54Z
dlang/dmd pull request #9471 "Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750" was merged into stable: - 592d0c790b90be5aab9d011200b98efa539b4a27 by Puneet Goel: Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750 The Semantic (pass 1) analysis for classes is handled by visit(ClassDeclaration ) method of DsymbolSemanticVisitor class. For a given class, this method may be run multiple times in order to resolve forward references. The method incrementally tries to resolve the types referred to by the members of the class. The subsequent calls to this method are short-circuited if the class members have been fully analyzed. For this the code tests that it is not the first/main call to the method (semanticRun == PASS.init else branch), scx is not set, and that the cldec.symtab is already set. If all these conditions are met, the method returns. But before returning, the method was setting cldec.semanticRun to PASS.semanticdone. It should not set semanticRun since the class has not been fully analyzed yet. The base class analysis for this class could be pending and as a result vtable may not have been fully created. This fake setting of semanticRun results in the semantic analyzer to believe that the class has been fully analyzed. As exposed by the issues 19656, 19657, 19746 and 19750, it may result in compile time errors when a derived type class is getting analyzed and because of this fake semanticdone on the base class, the semantic analysis construes that an overridden method is not defined in the base class. Issue 19655 exposes a scenario where a buggy vtable may be created and a call to class method may result in execution of some adhoc code. https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9471
Comment #5 by dlang-bot — 2019-03-25T20:54:31Z
dlang/dmd pull request #9489 "Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/stable' into merge_stable" was merged into master: - 58878aeb8d32474ac24a0dd51446533a93602564 by Puneet Goel: Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750 (#9471) Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750 merged-on-behalf-of: Nicholas Wilson <[email protected]> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9489
Comment #6 by dlang-bot — 2020-03-13T18:15:35Z
dlang/dmd pull request #10913 "[dmd-cxx] Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750 (#9471)" was merged into dmd-cxx: - 968386f6da15cb30c229bf0ca3325d86c6fa8714 by Puneet Goel: Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750 (#9471) Fix issues 19655, 19656, 19657, 19746 & 19750 merged-on-behalf-of: Nicholas Wilson <[email protected]> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10913