https://dlang.org/gpg_keys.html lists a bunch of gpg key fingerprints, but none of them match the signatures offered on download.html.
Closer inspection reveals that the signatures were made by subkeys, and since gpg_keys.html omits the subkey fingerprints, it cannot be used to check that the signatures are good. In other words, gpg_keys.html is currently useless, and can even lead someone to think the downloads might have been tampered with.
Suggestion:
Regenerate gpg_keys.html using the output of gpg --list-keys --with-subkey-fingerprint
Comment #1 by robert.schadek — 2024-12-15T15:28:04Z