against 1.055
might be a regression of issue 2773
compiling with optimization crashes the compiler.
public final class A {
private this() {
int i =0;
int j = i +1;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
i = j * 15;
j = i * 59;
}
}
Comment #1 by bugzilla — 2010-01-06T14:00:25Z
This also fails with DMD 2.039.
Internal error: backend/go.c 244
Comment #2 by clugdbug — 2010-01-07T00:02:12Z
(In reply to comment #0)
> against 1.055
>
> might be a regression of issue 2773
It isn't a regression. This is ancient -- it fails on DMD 0.175.
Comment #3 by clugdbug — 2010-01-11T21:10:35Z
The problem is simply that the optimiser needs too much time. The optimiser loops for a maximum of 200 times, but to optimize this example requires 290 loops.
On the line it's faulting on:
- assert(++iter < 200);
+ assert(++iter < 290);
However, there'll always be _some_ example where this happens. So a different approach is required. Maybe after 200 check that the number of elements is still decreasing on each pass through the loop; if it is, then just silently exit the loop without ICEing.
CAUSE: This section of the optimiser can only remove one comma expression per pass. So, the limit should be set based on the depth of comma expressions.
I don't know what the minimum iteration limit should be (the number of passes for performing all other optimisations) -- when setting it to 10, as in the code below, the test suite passes; a level of 5 is too low.
Note that the total limit used to be set to 80, before it was increased to 200. I am certain that the 80 was caused by comma expressions. Need to run this through the DMC test suite, to see what the minimum iteration limit should be.
----------
PATCH: Add this function to go.c. Actually it needs to used in the fix for bug 4379, as well. So maybe it should go into another file, or appear in a header file.
/*
Return the maximum nesting of comma expressions in the elem tree.
For example, (((a, b) + c),d) * (e,f) has comma depth 2.
*/
int commaDepth(elem *e)
{
if ( EBIN(e))
{
int depth = (e->Eoper == OPcomma) ? 1 : 0;
return depth + commaDepth(e->E1) + commaDepth(e->E2);
}
else if (EUNA(e))
return commaDepth(e->E1);
return 0;
}
Then, go.c, optfunc(), around line 230:
if (localgot)
{ // Initialize with:
// localgot = OPgot;
elem *e = el_long(TYnptr, 0);
e->Eoper = OPgot;
e = el_bin(OPeq, TYnptr, el_var(localgot), e);
startblock->Belem = el_combine(e, startblock->Belem);
}
+ // Each pass through the loop can reduce only one level of comma expression.
+ // The infinite loop check needs to take this into account.
+ int iterationLimit = 10;
+ for (b = startblock; b; b = b->Bnext)
+ {
+ if (!b->Belem)
+ continue;
+ int d = commaDepth(b->Belem);
+ if (d > iterationLimit)
+ iterationLimit = d;
+ }
// Some functions can take enormous amounts of time to optimize.
// We try to put a lid on it.
starttime = clock();
do
{
//printf("iter = %d\n", iter);
#if TX86
//assert(++iter < 80); /* infinite loop check */
- assert(++iter < 200); /* infinite loop
+ assert(++iter < iterationLimit); /* infinite loop check */
#else