Bug 3687 – Array operation "slice times scalar" tramples over memory

Status
RESOLVED
Resolution
FIXED
Severity
major
Priority
P2
Component
druntime
Product
D
Version
D1 (retired)
Platform
x86
OS
Windows
Creation time
2010-01-07T13:16:00Z
Last change time
2014-04-18T09:17:47Z
Keywords
patch, wrong-code
Assigned to
sean
Creator
eriatarka84

Attachments

IDFilenameSummaryContent-TypeSize
548druntime_floatarray_times_scalar.diffpatch against druntime to fix the problemtext/plain3253

Comments

Comment #0 by eriatarka84 — 2010-01-07T13:16:38Z
The following code fails with an assertion failure when it clearly shouldn't: ==================================================== void main() { float[64] array; int i = 42; auto slice = array[]; slice[] *= 2f; assert(i == 42); } ==================================================== Array bounds checking doesn't catch this. I presume that the code in the runtime to execute this array operation is buggy.
Comment #1 by eriatarka84 — 2010-01-08T06:53:11Z
Created attachment 548 patch against druntime to fix the problem
Comment #2 by eriatarka84 — 2010-01-08T06:55:22Z
Yes, it is buggy. I've uploaded a patch to fix the routine which does float array times scalar multiplication, though probably it's a better idea to file it at druntime directly. I'll crosspost it there.
Comment #3 by eriatarka84 — 2010-01-08T09:20:06Z
I've realized that the other float array operations of the form "array op= scalar" suffer from the same problem. Please hold off with applying this patch, I'll provide a more general one. I hope string mixins are ok to use in druntime? There's quite a lot of code duplication in these array modules.
Comment #4 by eriatarka84 — 2010-01-18T01:41:19Z
I submitted the patch to Tango (since that's what I use currently), it was folded into their copy of the runtime. I would appreciate if someone merged the changes into druntime to keep them in lockstep. Patch and discussion are here: http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/1831
Comment #5 by clugdbug — 2010-01-20T06:56:52Z
The original test case passes on D2, but here's a test case which fails on both D1 and D2. ------ void main() { float[66] array; array[] = 0; array[64] = 42; array[65] = 43; array[0..64] *= 2f; assert(array[65] == 43); assert(array[64] == 42); } ------
Comment #6 by clugdbug — 2010-01-21T04:00:30Z
Changes checked into druntime svn 234 and D1 phobos svn 1403.
Comment #7 by bugzilla — 2010-01-30T22:41:36Z
fixed dmd 1.056 and 2.040