Comment #0 by bearophile_hugs — 2010-08-17T04:58:17Z
I have already tried and appreciated lockstep() (and few successive updates):
http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1871
But I'd like lockstep() and zip() to have their names swapped, because I think the current lockstep() is more commonly useful in my code, so it's better to give it the shorter name.
Comment #1 by issues.dlang — 2010-08-17T16:37:48Z
Well, short names are good, but I find lockstep() to be far more descriptive, and zip() does not make me think of what lockstep() does at all. So, personally, I'd prefer to keep the name lockstep(), but I understand why you'd want to change it.
Comment #2 by bearophile_hugs — 2013-06-29T03:16:36Z
Wontfix because I think it's better to just deprecate and then remove lockstep(), as discussed in Issue 8155