The following (perfectly valid) D code is rejected by dmd:
int main(){
int a;
int *u=&(a ? a : (a ? a : a));
return 0;
}
Error Message:
minimal.d(3): Error: incompatible types for ((&a) ? (&*(a ? &a : &a))): 'int*' and 'int**'
minimal.d(3): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (a ? __error : (__error)) of type int* to int*
This is nonsense, clearly, the expression
(a ? a : (a ? a : a)) evaluates to a valid int lvalue, therefore it can have the Address-of operator applied to it.
(For comparison: the following code compiles:
int main(){
int a;
(a ? a : (a ? a : a))=a;
return 0;
})
Comment #1 by timon.gehr — 2011-04-18T16:00:30Z
I had a look at the DMD source code and I identified the problem:
expression.c (1326):
Expression *Expression::addressOf(Scope *sc){
Expression *e;
//printf("Expression::addressOf()\n");
e = toLvalue(sc, NULL);
e = new AddrExp(loc, e);
e->type = type->pointerTo();
return e;
}
Note how the instruction e->type = type->pointerTo(); is dependent on the fact that method toLvalue does not change the type of the expression. However, the current Implementation of CondExp::toLvalue changes the object while creating an Lvalue. Disaster strikes because CondExp::toLvalue calls addressOf on it's two subexpressions. If one or both of them are CondExp, e->type may be incorrect. The reported bug is an instance of this one.
This can be easily resolved by operating on a copy of the CondExp object in CondExp::toLvalue instead of on the original object.
Suggested fix:
Replace the current implementation of CondExp::toLvalue in expression.c (11140)
- Expression *CondExp::toLvalue(Scope *sc, Expression *ex)
- {
- PtrExp *e;
-
- // convert (econd ? e1 : e2) to *(econd ? &e1 : &e2)
- e = new PtrExp(loc, this, type);
-
- e1 = e1->addressOf(sc);
- //e1 = e1->toLvalue(sc, NULL);
-
- e2 = e2->addressOf(sc);
- //e2 = e2->toLvalue(sc, NULL);
-
- typeCombine(sc);
-
- type = e2->type;
- return e;
- }
With this one:
+ Expression *CondExp::toLvalue(Scope *sc, Expression *ex)
+ {
+ CondExp *e = (CondExp*)copy();
+
+ // convert (econd ? e1 : e2) to *(econd ? &e1 : &e2)
+ e->e1 = e->e1->addressOf(sc);
+ e->e2 = e->e2->addressOf(sc);
+
+ e->typeCombine(sc);
+
+ e->type = e->e2->type;
+ return new PtrExp(loc, e, type);
+ }