Bug 6306 – Regression(2.054): [CTFE] Strange behavior of indirect recursive call in CTFE

Status
RESOLVED
Resolution
FIXED
Severity
regression
Priority
P2
Component
dmd
Product
D
Version
D2
Platform
x86
OS
Windows
Creation time
2011-07-13T02:06:00Z
Last change time
2011-07-31T12:08:56Z
Keywords
wrong-code
Assigned to
nobody
Creator
youxkei

Comments

Comment #0 by youxkei — 2011-07-13T02:06:02Z
void main(){} struct Result{bool match; string value; string rest;} Result paren(string input){ if(input[0] == '('){ input = input[1..$]; }else{ return Result(false, "", input); } string[] strs; while(true){ Result r = function(string input){ Result r = paren(input); if(r.match){ return r; } if(input[0] == ')'){ return Result(false, "", input); }else{ return Result(true, input[0..1], input[1..$]); } }(input); if(r.match){ strs = strs ~ r.value; input = r.rest; }else{ break; } } if(input[0] == ')'){ input = input[1..$]; }else{ return Result(false, "", input); } string value = "("; foreach(str; strs){ value = value ~ str; } value = value ~ ")"; return Result(true, value, input); } bool test(){//unittest auto r = paren("((a))"); assert(r.match); assert(r.rest == ""); assert(r.value == "((a))"); //assertion1 return true; } unittest{ static assert(test()); //line1 test(); } This code cannot be compiled by dmd v2.054 because the assertion1, which is the compile-time assertion, fails. (Incidentally, r.value is "(a(a))" at assertion1.) However, dmd v2.052 can compile this code well. When I commented out the line 1, the code became able to be compiled dmd v2.054 and the run-time unittest succeeded. The function paren is a function which parses string in balanced-parentheses and returns parsed string. It has indirect recursive call or it calls a function which calls it. When I rewrote the code as a code which has direct recursive call, the code the code became able to be compiled dmd v2.054 and the run-time unittest succeeded, too. This is why I think indirect recursive call has strange behavior and it causes the assertion1 to fail.
Comment #1 by clugdbug — 2011-07-27T00:25:42Z
Reduced test case shows this is very nasty bug in failing to restore local variable values after an indirect recursive call. ------------- void recurse6306() { bug6306(false); } bool bug6306(bool b) { int x = 0; if (b) recurse6306(); assert(x == 0); // fails!!!!! x = 1; return true; } static assert( bug6306(true) );
Comment #2 by bugzilla — 2011-07-31T12:08:56Z