Bug 6924 – An alias this problem to implement a Typedef

Status
RESOLVED
Resolution
DUPLICATE
Severity
normal
Priority
P2
Component
dmd
Product
D
Version
D2
Platform
x86
OS
Windows
Creation time
2011-11-09T20:03:00Z
Last change time
2011-11-12T06:56:29Z
Assigned to
nobody
Creator
bearophile_hugs

Comments

Comment #0 by bearophile_hugs — 2011-11-09T20:03:18Z
I find typedef useful still. While trying to create something like a typedef using a struct with "alias this", I have found this problem: struct Typedef(T) { T data; alias data this; } alias int[] TA1; typedef int[] TA2; alias Typedef!(int[]) TA3; immutable TA1 a1; immutable TA2 a2; TA3 a3a; immutable TA3 a3b; static this() { a1 = [1, 2, 3]; // OK a2 = [1, 2, 3]; // OK a3a = [1, 2, 3]; // OK a3b = [1, 2, 3]; // line 16, error } void main() {} DMD 2.057beta gives: test.d(16): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression ([1,2,3]) of type int[] to immutable(Typedef!(int[]))
Comment #1 by k.hara.pg — 2011-11-12T06:56:29Z
I think this is a same issue with bug 6174. The assignment expression a3b = [1, 2, 3]; is translated to a3b.data = [1, 2, 3]; , and current dmd does not allow indirect initialization of members with assignment. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6174 ***