Bug 6924 – An alias this problem to implement a Typedef
Status
RESOLVED
Resolution
DUPLICATE
Severity
normal
Priority
P2
Component
dmd
Product
D
Version
D2
Platform
x86
OS
Windows
Creation time
2011-11-09T20:03:00Z
Last change time
2011-11-12T06:56:29Z
Assigned to
nobody
Creator
bearophile_hugs
Comments
Comment #0 by bearophile_hugs — 2011-11-09T20:03:18Z
I find typedef useful still. While trying to create something like a typedef using a struct with "alias this", I have found this problem:
struct Typedef(T) {
T data;
alias data this;
}
alias int[] TA1;
typedef int[] TA2;
alias Typedef!(int[]) TA3;
immutable TA1 a1;
immutable TA2 a2;
TA3 a3a;
immutable TA3 a3b;
static this() {
a1 = [1, 2, 3]; // OK
a2 = [1, 2, 3]; // OK
a3a = [1, 2, 3]; // OK
a3b = [1, 2, 3]; // line 16, error
}
void main() {}
DMD 2.057beta gives:
test.d(16): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression ([1,2,3]) of type int[] to immutable(Typedef!(int[]))
Comment #1 by k.hara.pg — 2011-11-12T06:56:29Z
I think this is a same issue with bug 6174.
The assignment expression
a3b = [1, 2, 3];
is translated to
a3b.data = [1, 2, 3];
, and current dmd does not allow indirect initialization of members with assignment.
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6174 ***