Comment #1 by andrej.mitrovich — 2012-01-03T14:53:21Z
That's what version(none) is for.
Comment #2 by monarchdodra — 2013-08-30T00:20:56Z
(In reply to comment #1)
> That's what version(none) is for.
I read the title, and I was going to say the same thing.
Can we close this as wontfix?
Comment #3 by yebblies — 2013-08-30T01:09:42Z
This has some advantages over version(none):
- the unittest is still compiled, just not executed
- a test runner could print a message for the disabled unittest
Comment #4 by andrej.mitrovich — 2013-08-30T06:36:32Z
(In reply to comment #3)
> This has some advantages over version(none):
>
> - the unittest is still compiled, just not executed
> - a test runner could print a message for the disabled unittest
Good points. Also, since it's semantically analyzed it will catch compile-time errors.
Comment #5 by robert.schadek — 2024-12-13T17:57:34Z