Bug 7395 – Need error on declaring a variable after `if` and`synchronized` without {}

Status
NEW
Severity
enhancement
Priority
P4
Component
dmd
Product
D
Version
D2
Platform
All
OS
All
Creation time
2012-01-29T04:13:17Z
Last change time
2024-12-13T17:58:12Z
Keywords
diagnostic
Assigned to
No Owner
Creator
Denis Shelomovskii
Moved to GitHub: dmd#18409 →

Comments

Comment #0 by verylonglogin.reg — 2012-01-29T04:13:17Z
--- synchronized int i; // should be definitely an error if(true) int i; // IMHO, should be an error if(true) l: f(); // should be probably an error --- Consider the following D code copied from C: --- volatile int* p; // volatile statements deprecated; use synchronized statements instead --- A one is forced to change `volatile` -> `synchronized` after brief look at the error and, if he will be unhappy enough, his program will compile. Therefore a case with `if` looks lass common but still signalize about an error. An it is an error in C# (like a variant with label probably because of possible `l: int i;` case): `error CS1023: Embedded statement cannot be a declaration or labeled statement`. Also look at Issue 2197.
Comment #1 by robert.schadek — 2024-12-13T17:58:12Z
THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB https://github.com/dlang/dmd/issues/18409 DO NOT COMMENT HERE ANYMORE, NOBODY WILL SEE IT, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN MOVED TO GITHUB